ARCH 2150

I could not recommend a class more. This class was one of my favorites at UVA, although it is important to know that I am a GSVS major so I could definitely be biased. This class was composed of like 8 total hw assignments, 2-3 small projects, and 1 big final project that was an advocacy letter based on something that you cared about. Lecture attendance was not necessary after completing the HW classes and almost each class was a guest lecture. If you have any interest in sustainability, this course provides and interdisciplinary look into sustainability in so many different lenses. Also I don't think there was a single time that the deadline for an assignment was not extended. Very chill class that does not have a ton of work but isn't totally miserable to sit through. I loved it and recommend.

The Global Sustainability course is one that is multi-disciplinary that covers so many different topics ranging from economics to politics. I particularly enjoyed the course especially with the guest speakers that came to the different lecturers. This helped provide a greater insight into the different aspects of sustainability and how everything is interlinked. As far as the assignments go you need to complete 7 reading responses for the assigned readings or videos before class (35%), complete 3 exercises (Systems Diagram,Climate Simulation and GapMinder) (25%), 3 Discussion posts (10%), and the Advocacy Letter Project (30%). Therefore, in this class it is very manageable to achieve an A without feeling overwhelmed.
#tCFfall22

This course has been my favorite at UVA so far! I loved that Professor Crisman brought in a different professor each week. Other courses related to sustainability fail to paint the full picture, but I think this course does a great job covering all of the bases. There is a decent amount of reading for lecture, but a lot of it is enjoyable and modern. This semester there were no quizzes or exams just a paper, reading responses, and other small assignments. This made for a relaxed and enjoyable learning environment. As someone who gets really stressed out about grades, this was an amazing opportunity for me to learn about a subject I am passionate about in a low stress environment. However, Professor Crisman did mention adding exams back into the course in the future due to a lack of attendance, so I would not count on this course being as relaxed in the future. While this is listed as an architecture course, there are students from all across the university in it. This is a class I have been and will continue to highly recommend to people.

This class serves as a great introduction to Global Sustainability and actually encouraged me to apply for the minor. Unfortunately, I believe that the class size is actually detrimental to quality for this class. Grading was extremely slow, and if a student wanted feedback we would have to indicate that before receiving our actual grades. I understand that this class may have been hard to manage due to its popularity and large size. Other than that, this class was great! There were some excellent guest lecturers from other departments at The University. Professor Crisman is a great lecturer, and her interest in urban architecture was absolutely fascinating. I would recommend this class to anyone. It was not a difficult class, and it gives you a lot of information of things we can do to make our planet healthier.

I took this online bc zoom university but I liked this class. Each lecture was interesting and the revolving door of guest lecturers brought new perspectives on new topics. Organized class and graded fairly imo. We did have some technical difficulties and slow grading but it be like that sometimes.

Course layout: 4 quizzes (40 pts), 1 short written assignment (10 pts), 1 powerpoint presentation (10 pts), particpation (5pts), final "advocacy letter" paper (35 pts).

#tCFfall20

The structure of this class was absolutely horrendous. 1) we were supposed to have 6 reading quizzes throughout the semester, but we only had 2. then 3 were crammed in at the end. and you could get a quiz on a topic from 3 weeks ago as if you look over your notes every night. 2) while it was cool having a different professor every week talk about a sustainability topic that was unique to his/her profession, the teaching style differed every class so you don't even get to understand how Crisman teaches or then what the final will be like. 3) Friday workshops were nice because it meant we never had a quiz or anything, but they were supposed to help with our project pitches and they did not...at all. it would've been more effective to have these people speak in the classroom and show pictures of the places. seeing it in person didn't make it easier to understand. also sometimes it took me 25 minutes to get to the obscure location so if you have class before, it's difficult to make it. 4) the final was supposed to cover "big ideas" but had a lot of really random/obscure terms. at the end of the day, for the amount of time it took to do the readings and the amount of detail you needed to take from lectures, you feel like so much information wasn't tested.
still ended up with a good grade, but wouldn't recommend unless you have to take it.

Global Sustainability has to be one of my favorite classes that I have ever taken! Yes, I agree that the class itself was a little bit incoherent and sometimes hard to follow, but you will leave the class with a better understanding of what sustainability is and what impact it has on your life. It was especially interesting because we had different professors from different areas of the university come and give lectures every class, and it was cool because sometimes they pitched their classes and you looked at how what they do ties in with sustainable actions. Honestly, it was not really hard to get an A because you got points in easy ways, such as attendance and short reading response passages. I do have to say that the final exam was somewhat obscure, and everyone was taken by surprise by it. However, the Think Global Act Local Project, which is also several points is quite easy to accomplish in a really short amount of time. TAKE THIS CLASS! You won't regret it.

I took this course during Fall 2018 and absolutely despised this class. The course structure was incohesive and so unorganized. Its a shame because initially I was very excited about the class then as we got going, it went downhill from there. Very true about the workshops being a scramble to get to considering its only a 50 min class. The guest lectures were the things that kept me going they were interesting. There are three ta's for the course along with the professor and all of them were unresponsive and unhelpful when it came to receiving clarification on something. The concepts and ideas we learn in class arent hard to grasp, but the course structure makes you just want to rip your hair out.

I am not a Global Sustainability major myself but I took this class as a way of deciding whether or not I would want to apply to the major, and honestly its making me seriously consider not doing it. I will say that the material of all the lectures was really interesting and i actually learned a lot on topics that i probably wouldn't have encountered otherwise (such as economics of environment, corporate resiliency, etc.). However, the class structure was so messy, irritating, and unfair that it wasn't worth it. First off, we were required for participation points toward our final grade to attend 'workshops' every Friday during class period where we would learn about the sustainable efforts around UVA to inspire our final project pitch due at the end of the semester (which is a pitch for a short-term sustainable action on grounds). The majority of the time, these workshops were halfway across grounds at random locations that are hard to get to (like Skipwith Hall or the Heating plant), and you learn no helpful material that couldn't be taught in a lecture setting. Not to mention the fact if you have classes before and after the class block it is nearly impossible to get to the workshops on time and also class on time without missing information on either end. Additionally, we were supposed to have 6 reading responses spread out through the course of the semester, but Crisman was so disorganized that she only gave us 2 in the middle of the semester, and then crammed 3 more in just before our final, so we only had 5 in total. These reading responses weren't awful, but if you couldn't remember specific details from the lectures or readings, even if you understood the concepts and could demonstrate that in your writing, odds are that you wouldn't get full marks. The final had a similar type structure as reading responses in that it was supposedly testing us on the 'big ideas' we learned throughout the semester; it consisted of short set of definitions, a short set of concepts and their importance, and then longer essay responses. However, I felt the definitions chosen were quite unfair and very specific, and were only things you'd remember if you happen to write down a definition that was focused on for 30 seconds out a 50 min lecture--not the 'big ideas' she said would be on the exam. All in all, it was not the worst class i've ever taken but i found myself very frustrated over the lack of organization and communication throughout the semester, and saddened that i couldn't enjoy the content of the class more.

Do the readings and pull good examples from them! The structure of the class is awesome, but grading (in my opinion) is pretty dependent on the TA. Would recommend if you want a good change in pace class wise...

In short: love the content of the course, hate the way it's graded.

In length: This class is full of interesting and useful information, presented in lecture format by guest experts from various fields. That part of the class is very interesting. The other part of the class is a group project, for which you are assigned a topic and required to develop a sort of proposal. Not the most fun thing in the world, but it's cool to see how the concepts you maybe touched on in a lecture or two can be applied to things going on around grounds.

Your grade in the class is 50% groupwork, 20% cumulative final exam (essay and short answer), 15% between 3 reading quizzes (short answer), and 15% attending sustainability events and doing a self reflection. Your TA is the one grading your work, which can be frustrating. My TA would take off points on reading quizzes without explaining why. Don't let that deter you from taking this class though, I still recommend it to anyone looking for a relaxed class.

This was an overall okay class. I really liked it at first, but the longer it went on, the more biased it seemed to me. I really liked all the guess speakers and the group project is a breeze, but I thought some of the ideas were a little too far fetched to actually become reality. Also the final is extremely difficult and if you have not been taking notes on the readings through the semester, you are in trouble. Professor Crimson is very enthusiastic about sustainability and I would recommend this class if you're very into environmental action.

Guest lectures are great, and fun. One of the most fun classes i have taken. Group project counts for most of the grade.

Interesting class organized as a series of guest lectures from professors and community members with diverse backgrounds relating to different aspects of sustainability. Topics included architecture, food, water, energy, business, etc. We ha reading and short assignments for lectures once a week, then the other day we split into smaller discussion groups and worked on sustainability-related group projects in the community.