PLIR 3310

Smith is a very bland lecturer, so beware, but you can easily recognize his passion and strong intellect for the subject. As with most politics classes, the interesting stuff comes last, so 2/3rds of the class is theory based, should definitely be a PLPT instead. The material is interesting overall, as we really hash out ethical choices in International Relations. The grade is based off of two 7-8 page papers (one research and the other creative writing), and a significantly difficult final that is based off of the dense readings. Most of the readings in the second half of the course are interesting, but I would only recommend this class if you are VERY interested in philosophy, ethics, moral choice, etc. There are plenty of other cool PLIR classes out there! Smith is brilliant, overall, though and it was an honor to take a class with him! He's written many publications and has met with very famous IR theorists. His political views are strongly idealist and doesn't have any shame displaying that in class, so if that bothers you here is your warning! A decent class overall, but could be made more interesting.

Smith is fantastic. Personally, I enjoyed the first 2/3 of the class the most where the readings were more theory based. Smith's lectures were also much more cohesive and structured during the presentation of this material. Towards the end of the semester, the class got a little chaotic and many students lost patience/got bored (as evident through attendance). The final was hard and worth studying for + revisiting readings from the second half of the course. I am glad I took this class.

This class is seriously interesting. The first half of the class focuses on the origins of human rights with readings from Thucydides, Kant, and Weber et alia. The first paper focuses on those three authors and isn't too difficult if you do the readings. The second half is centered around modern examples of human rights violations as well as the institutions that are meant to protect them. The second paper is on a book/film analysis that does not require you to draw from the readings and gives you room to be really creative with your interpretations. The final is identification, short answer, and one longer essay that you can prepare in advance. The information in the class is interesting, I can not stress that enough, and if you are interested in international politics, this class is for you. BUT, Professor Smith is pretty boring. His lectures consist of him using fancy sounding words and you can do the readings without attending the lectures and be just fine. My biggest issue with this class is that there is almost no objectivity. There are no rubrics for the papers and you don't get the final exam grade back, only your overall grade. Theo is an awesome TA and knows his stuff, but Smith swamps his TAs in work because there is no way only two of them can really read a paper and grade it given the number of students they have. I got a 90 on both of my papers and they had no comments on them except "good work" which is annoying if you want to know why you got a 90. Tl;dr interesting class, lots of reading, professor is boring, tough to improve writing.

This class has an excessive amount of reading that is completely unnecessary. It's absurd. Professor Smith seems like a really nice guy and he is super well versed in the human rights field; however, his lectures are long winded and he often goes on tangents that seem inconsequential. The two papers were relatively easy to get through, but the final was rough. The first section of the final requires you to identify quotes/ phrases and elaborate on them. The task in itself is not hard at all until you look at the ridiculous amount of readings Smith could pull from.

The amount of readings is absurd, but the quality of readings is incredible. It is one of those classes where when you actually do the work you feel like it was worthwhile. Lectures are slightly scattered, but Smith's intellect and passion for the material is obvious. Definitely worth attending. Also, Smith in general is a super friendly and easy professor to talk to, would definitely recommend going to office hours. The course is incredibly theory based, so if that's not your style you will probably hate it.

The comments say that the reading is absurd, and it's TRUE. But you don't have to read them. Just read what you need for writing essays.
The class is two essays and a final. So you need to read for the first essay but after that, just do what you think would be good for the final honestly. I got an A+ on the first essay and then we didn't get any grades back but I got an A+ in the class, so trust me when I say DO NOOOOT REAAAADDDD unnecessarily - choose carefully. Don't read all the authors, just specialize in a few and DO NOT listen to the syllabus. Even Smith put readings that he doesn't address at all.
I found the class interesting as a starting point for the subject, but I didn't enjoy it really. Smith is organized in that he posts outlines for his lectures, but they are purely just his own outlines. Do not equate this to outlines of what you need to know. His lectures didn't help me at all until maybe towards the end, but he's so vague about everything that it doesn't really tell you much about anything. I relied on readings for everything and all of my essays, and his lectures didn't help. It's a pretty skippable class actually. Some classes you just don't learn anything. Don't get me wrong, he's smart - he just can't explain things well.
I thought for the final that I'd need to catch up on readings. That's a lie, no you don't need to. DO NOT buy all of the books on his list, it's a mistake. He doesnt even touch or address some of them and neither did my TA. Marc was a good TA, but he was new to the class so he just said read everything (again, not necessary). So for example, they say to read all of the first book, do not. DO NOT. People just did a lot of extra in the one things in this class because the reading assignments were confusing, so don't do that. Do what is necessary to survive and nothing more.

Michael Smith is probably one of the most learned people at UVA. This class is very interesting, as you learn about the foundation of ethics and how others have historically approached the vague and confusing topic. It can also be difficult, as there is a lot of information to be learned and a lot of reading to be done in this class. Lectures can be super entertaining because Smith is so smart and pulls relevant quotes out of thin air. This class is definitely a good one to take if you are Foreign Affairs/Government.

Avoid this class at all costs if you respect yourself. Smith is bland in lecture and often goes on dumb tangents during lectures. If he ever says a contentious argument beware he may use "I went to Harvard" as an excuse to not explain the argument and flex on you. As a politics major worst class I've ever taken in the department, shouldn't even be a PLIR but a PLPT/

This class seems very intimidating at first, but trust me, it's not. Professor Smith is clearly a wealth of knowledge as noted by other commenters, and for that reason alone I would recommend this class. He is very knowledgeable about the realm of ethics, and that being said I think this class should be a political thought/theory class, not an international relations class. Know that this class talks about the background of ethics and ethical thinkers/theories, more so than actual human rights issues around the world. Lecture can be hard to follow at times as Professor Smith's thoughts can be rather scattered, but he provides an outline with each lecture to help you with note taking. This class has 2 essays and a final. There is a lot of reading assigned, but you DO NOT need to read all of it. If you have a good TA they will tell you what to read, and offer weekly questions that act as a guide so you know the main points you need to find. I had Nicola and he was amazing. The essays are graded fairly, and the final exam is tricky, but Smith gives you studying material. Also, you are allowed to prepare for 1/3 of the final before hand. Overall I would recommend this course, if you can get a good TA.

#tCFspring2021

Wow. Thought it would be an easy A, but I got an A- for wayyyy to much work. Would never take a class from prof smith again. The class and prof are incredibly disorganized. He would constantly jump around subjects during lectures and did not use any power points or any helpful materials to guide the lectures. If you were looking for a specific topic or answer you had to jump around five different lectures to get a clear answer. He would say really important things in the middle of sentences (surrounded by 10 minutes of useless information about his personal life and opinions) without any warning so you had to pay attention constantly. My ta was Nicola, I recommended him highly. Whatever you do, do not choose tolu. Tolu was my TA for a different class, I don't recommend her. Tolu and Lauren were also not liked in this class from what I've heard from other people. Overall the subject of this class was very unfocused and boring, I would not take international relations again as a politics major. overall I don't think I learned anything - everything was very surface-level and a lot of common sense rather than a deep dive into the subject or insightful knowledge. Got an A-/B+ on the first paper which I thought was a little undeserved based on the comments my TA left. The final was take home and too hard. The second paper was easy, don't know what I got on it but it did not help me apparently. WAYYYY too much reading that has nothing to do with helping us learn the main topic besides providing a little anecdote that prof talked about for 2 minutes.