Your feedback has been sent to our team.
37 Ratings
Hours/Week
No grades found
— Students
Professor Freeman is really enthusiastic and this class isn't as bad as most people say it is. The tests are straight from the lectures and you don't have to read the book. You have an assignment due every week in lab, which sucks, but they usually aren't worth much. If you go to lecture the tests are easy.
Unfortunately, this class is required for the psychology major, so just be ready for the following: Really slow, boring, ineffective lectures. The return of the four-function calculator. Arbitrary rules. Bad group projects (to be fair, the lab isn't as bad as 305, but the group project is a pain). Really corny jokes. Lecture slides riddled with errors...
It's easy to do well if you can bring yourself to think like Freeman on exams. I actually relied on the book quite a bit- it does a better job explaining the different statistical tests you'll learn and the practice problems are more effective than the exams Freeman posts on-line.
This class is my conception of hell. Lectures belittle students, but no not teach in a constructive way. Then tests trick and confuse you and are graded difficultly, confirming the professor's preconceived notion that his students just aren't that bright. Multiple lectures ended earlier or ended in complete confusion because the professor made irrecoverable mistakes in his slides that he couldn't even figure out how to recover from (like using the wrong formula from the very beginning of the lecture). If you must take this class, take responsibility for your own learning (assuming the professor will teach what you need to know will disappoint you), do read the book, and don't attend lecture, it will have the opposite-than-desired effect on your learning.
Get us started by writing a question!
It looks like you've already submitted a answer for this question! If you'd like, you may edit your original response.